Tuesday, March 25, 2008

To say or not to say

I see some of the most successful bloggers out there being incredibly soft and not occupying any ground of the clear statement. In a certain way, they are not trying to criticize anything. If everybody sustains from giving a critic and from condemning the negative stuff that surround us, then what are we left with? If it all boils down to the talking about the flowers and nice things that you should have in mind when decorating your house with, where is that going to take us?

If political correctness is all about not saying anything than why bother at all with it? During the time of the II world war one great writer said that he was absolutely stunned with so many writers of that time talking about moon and sunny fields while the greatest human disaster ever was going on in front of everybody's eyes.

What makes a good writing, regardless if we are talking about blogs, or journalism, is a combination of the ideas and the technical ability. Furthermore, the first one always prevails when it comes to my taste. If a man of letters can come out with important and fresh ideas, then he will gain more of my attention. Of course, the technical side is not to be neglected. Writing is after all an art. The form of art that many people consider to be the most divine and above the others. My opinion is not far from that. Only the rare ones have the ability of combining the great, meaningful, lines together with the impressive form and crafting of the written word. In my modest opinion examples of such a bravura are Milan Kundera or Paul Auster.

On the other hand there are writers with strikingly adorable technical abilities – their sentence is perfect, their clauses are breathtaking, but they are not telling us about anything. The more important – they are not saying anything new.

One of the most respectful writers in my language recently published a book which is all about the medieval time and about the circumstances on Balkans back then. The book was written exceptionally, with an incomparable style. True, some were saying that book is reminding a little bit of an other writer – Bosnian Nobelist Ivo Andric, whose obsessive subject was the medieval time on Balkans as well. I could not finish that book. It was written masterfully; no doubt it was a great piece of art. Even so, it was not telling me anything. I was wondering why this writer, recognized and respected worldwide – took this subject that was already explored by so many. Recent happenings on Balkans, in the time of nineties are still screaming their way with the unsolved and shamefully neglected questions – the questions that needs to be resolved for the sake of not only the people of Southeastern Europe but for the sake of the whole world. Those questions are – the problem of the war criminals still on the loose; the questions of people deprived of their basic human rights; the question of unconstrained nationalistic orgies and many many more. I must say that I am terrified with a widely held notion that silence is the key.

The moment that we are living in is so rich in turbulence and if anything it's overflowing with numerous resources for writing and talking about it. Yes, that is what I am thinking about it – here where we are, and there is no much need to wander any further – lies everything that we need to talk about, to protest and to adore.

6 comments:

summersaid...

hello, your english language is very good. :)

J. C.said...

Thanks a lot, I am open to all suggestions and advices, thanks for the encouragement

franscudsaid...

Hi JC,
I agree with you, and I think it applies to all art. Certainly, here in the US we're flooded with many examples of music, film, and writing that are technically perfect and yet speak of nothing important. That's our popular culture, and I think it's goal is to distract us from the hard questions.

J. C.said...

Franscud, I thing that applies to the state of today's writing in general and worldwide. A similar parallel could be drown also with the today's postmodern writing production. It is to hermetic for me. For an example if you take look on the French literary production of the last 20 years you will see that almost nothing, except for the works of Michel Houellebecq, hasn't happened. So one of the greatest writing countries is unable to produce the significant works for so long. Everybody has forgotten what Sartre was saying 50 years ago, and instead with have hermetic and irrelevant stuff.

Bobbysaid...

Hello J.C., thanks for telling me about this post. I've come to the realization that most people fail to see the real issues underlying every major problem in this world. With bloggers, I've learned to accept that most write about meaningless drivel, but I cannot change that. Also, it doesn't keep me from reading or being good friends with people who write uninteresting or challenging posts.

What is important is that I write what I think is important as I can only control myself. So, for those of us who do strive for excellence and do our best to cut to the heart of the matter - we stand as small group of individuals. I always think the essence of truth is simple and can be explained in but a few paragraphs, not a thousand page book filled with rhetorical fluff.

This is a really great post!

J. C.said...

Hi Bobby, thanks so much for your flattering words. I am a very far away form excellence when it comes to blogging, but o do find a pleasure n finding an excellent blog like yours. I thinks it is important to speak up, the ideas are much more important than how you say "fluff". We could certainly agree on that one.
Thanks a lot for visiting and reading.

Post a Comment

Let's hear from you

Google