
image by: jurvetson
Bosnia is a country located in the heart of Europe, and a country that is deeply divided by medieval standards of public life and government. The country has a constitution that is incompatible with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Here, one's nationality decides all. In a way there is a certain similarity between nationality in Bosnia (ethnical origins) and race in America.
It's what divides many people – not all, but a large percentage. I hope that those two terms will someday be less of a factor. People in my country base their positions not by their competency and skill, but above all – thanks to their political preferences and ethnic origins.
Presently in Bosnia, there is much to do regarding ethnic nationalism, ideas of the consociationalism, and these theories are making it impossible for open demokracy to be established here. I consider this as nonsense and hope that Obama's nomination will prove it as such, at least indirectly. Ultra-nationalists and consociationalism lovers want to say the differences between people are something that should be put on the throne as the central heart of every political debate.
I couldn't resist the temptation to put here a few of my remarks on American Presidential Campaign. I know the question of who is going to be next American President is a question of the whole world - I mean the whole world, not just USA.
I would like for this guy to be the next president. The history of African Americans is the history of struggle and humiliation. The History of marginalization at its highest. Listening to the Obama's speeches on YouTube, and following the news about the campaign around the net – I find him way superior to his opponent McCain.
I could be a bit malicious and say one thing I dislike about Obama and that's his 20 years long consistency in attending the preaching of a morally very suspicious and discredited priest, his famous Reverend, which is basically true. But again, Obama is just a man after all. And the role that he is about to take is much bigger than himself, and holds a much greater importance.
Here is what one of my American friends thinks about this campaign: "The Democratic Party is the Left Wing of the Republican Party. Both political parties receive their funding from the same corporations and serve the same masters. The men behind the corporations run America and the lobbyists for the corporations make the laws, not the senators or congressman. The political power in the USA is controlled by the corporate elite. The politicians are just WINDOW DRESSING! It will take 20 years to undo all the laws and legislation that Bush signed into law. Also, the Supreme Court of the USA is a Republican controlled court where each jurist serves for life".
Maybe because I am from Bosnia, I must take a little different stand on this. So here is my perspective:
There are many reasons why I consider Obama's Nomination to be a breakthrough. One of the main reasons is that he comes from the minority population in his country. This fact talks a lot about the political ripening of America, and at the same time – of the whole world as well. In wider context – Obama's story means also a huge blow to the racial, national and religious prejudices worldwide. Barack's very nomination for president is a precedent in the world's politics which has potential to prove that the universal human values are of the greatest importance. Or at least, it can bring such a hope.
What it boils down to is that people should be voting for the ideas representing common good and benefits and not only for the people representing their race, religion, or nationality. In Bosnia, something similar happened when Željko Komšić of Croatian nationality was elected as the member of the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina thanks to the huge number of votes given to him by, what I think are, mostly people for whom nationality isn't everything.
It is a sure bet that we can expect different turns and more interest for the real problems in world and in Bosnia as well, if a Democratic candidate wins the elections.
European incompetence and futility in trying to resolve Bosnia's puzzle is by now considered to be incurable. American Democrats are after all, the only significant political force ever interested in solving problems in a war torn country like Bosnia, and the nationalist and racism feasts that come along with it.
American Democrats are by "default" more interested in what is going on around the world than Republicans. It is impossible to deny that among the Republicans were some persons of quality, but that was too long ago. The fact that America has a chance to elect Obama, for Bosnia could mean also a possibility to build a more normal society, where the questions about one's ethnicity and religious preferences wouldn't play such an ominous role as they do now. The focus should be finally switched to universal human values, and turned around from the ones preposterously emphasizing race and nationality...as simple as that.
What comes down to it is not the question whether Obama be the next President of America, but the question why shouldn't he?
Unfortunately, the world is still in diapers but there is a great chance of advancing to the child potty seat.
Thanks to Euro and Nihad for contributing
Thursday, August 28, 2008
To Be or not To Be for Barack Obama
Labels:
Barack- Obama,
change,
hope,
politics,
To-Be-or- not-To-Be,
Zeljko-Komsic
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

18 comments:
Excellent post but a few things you should think about ... 1. The Supreme Court decided the last election when Bush won and Gore lost. The voter was not important. 2. If Bush starts a war with Iran, special laws come into play, and the election is canceled, and Bush continues. 3. If somebody (it could be a government group that attacks the USA,) then Martial law becomes reality and Bush continues. All these things are possible now if the Republicans want to continue their POLICE STATE, and stay in power.
Also remember the USA did nothing to save one million in Uganda from being slaughtered with hatchets. The USA only needed to send a regiment with rifles, and also remember in your own country, a weak Dutch United Nations force surrendered thousands of Bosnians to the Serbs to be exterminated.
Do not trust a POLICE STATE. It serves other masters.
I was very fascinated to read your perspective on our elections. I grew up in a time when our country was trying to learn not to be racist and I have no patience for people who are racists.
On the surface, I love the idea that we are at a place in our history where we could possibly finally elect a black man as president. On the other hand, I dont think it should be Obama.
It would be a whole blog post on its own to explain why, but he just has too many lapses in judgment, and too many people working to get him elected that I feel are bad people.
It saddens me that politicians have to be so good at being "politicians" just to get elected. Obama is a good politician and his speeches are pretty, but they don't do much to show me what he can actually DO to make this "change" he keeps talking about become reality.
@Euro and @Thyme2dream, thanks for your comments. I guess I am an Obama supporter because for me it looks that his being elected can bring a lot of good things and also change many perspectives and prejudices in today's political reality.
A very interesting article - I as many (across the world) have great hope for Obama - perhaps too much hope. We live in a world of media autocracy, whereby any populist figure can be built up and torn down again no matter the rights and wrongs. I'd love to think that any person could change the world (or at least America) however the media can only grab ratings with negative campaigning and scandal.
Paul, I believe that one person could make a significant change. For example, in Bosnia, it took only one vote in Parliament to decline the the pass of the vital constitutional reforms. The huge and unique chance was lost only because of one person. Also, in Russia, in the beginning of the last century, when Communism was about merge, only a vote or two decided the course of such a large part of the mankind.
These were no so lucky examples. What it comes down to it is that the awareness about the current political reality and possibilities is crucial today, for every person. And that the changes can be made.
I don't really discuss politics online- I have thought it pretty wacky that McCain brought in a virtual unknown- untried young lady as VP. I don't want to vote for McCain- I would be afraid of my two oldest sons getting drafted for some sort of conflict. I tend to vote Democratic although- I am a very conservative church going lady... most of my friends vote Republican without hesitation and it just baffles me for them to not see that Democrats have a better social solution.
Michelle, I agree with you on this one, you put it right in the last sentence of your comment. Cheers, nice to see you here.
Hi there! I actually got chastised when I commented on someone's blog that I didn't care what color anyone was. What's important to me is that the US gets someone who will change the way things are run. Actually, I have more precise views... but I won't go there.
I actually got told that I was horrible for not thinking of race.
Funny... I thought that is where we needed to be ~ color blind.
I'll stay color blind and vote the way I want to not because of someone's race, age or gender.
;)
This is a very interesting election! I just think the real issue - getting someone to run this country the way the majority wants it to be has become lost in parades, cheer squads and peoples' emotional baggage.
:(
Love and Light,
Monica
Hi Zyriana, sorry about your experience on that someone's nasty blog. If you do not mind I would like the link for it to see what is all about. I agree with you completely- and you have summarized the main idea of my post.
When we vote we can't change everything we want to. We can't change much. We certainly can't change enough. But we get the chance of changing something.
Lol at EuroYank. Last election, Bush Vs. Gore? Hit the snooze button too many times again?
As for the post, the last question is backwards, in my opinion. The question should be why should he be President, not why shouldn't he be.
Yes, the empty rhetoric of his speeches is appealing to some. But they lack substance. When he finally does address the issues, he is contradictory in his policies, and either uninformed or misleading in his statements.
For example, his health care plan and his tax cuts cannot coincide. But assuming they could, his tax plan promises a $1,000 to 95% of American workers. Yet under our tax code, only 66% earn enough to actually pay any tax at all after rebates and credits. Being as you can't cut something from nothing, his plan is conceptually impossible.
We see this repeatedly throughout his campaign. Empty rhetoric, even when it's iced over with a fancy speech and elaborate backdrops, will leave people feeling empty. This is why polls continue to show McCain in a race that opinion polls amongst the same people say he should be losing big time. At the end of the day, people will take a plan they don't necessarily agree with over no plan at all.
I'm an Independent and was at first beginning to fall for the slick talking Blessed Obama. But the more I listened to him the more I felt like I was being played and realized I better look deeper into this man. Something just felt 'too good to be true' (Yep, our grandparents, grandparents - passed that down for a reason you know)
I didn't like what I saw at all.
Owen, Steve, and Rearvumir - thanks for your comments, I am glad that people of different political views are responding to this post. Your opinions are appreciated.
your perspective on consocionalism is very interesting.
I met an american that worked in Bosnia as adviser to schwartz schiling and who was a very strong supporter of consocionalism and I have to say that, from all the people that I met on my trips to the region (if I add all of them it makes about 4 months of my life, counting from the first one in May 2006) this was the only person with whom ideological differences turned personal.
it gets on my nerves the way this kind of model is imposed... a model that has belgium as a positive example, while reality shows that the adoption of consocionalist theories in belgium actually deepened the divisions that existed, and now that the economic conditions changed and that now that the flemish, who were the poor part, became the rich part and the vallons the impovershed part, these divisions opened the door to exclusive racist nationalism... meanwhile, the opportunity to evolve to a civic concept was lost thanks to those people who sponsored these ideas.
Hi Sarah, thanks for the really insightful comment. The idea of a civil society in Bosnia looks like a dream now, and the same idea is also the biggest consocionalists' and ulta-nationalists' fear. But on the other hand it is a dram dreamed by too many people here. They say if a civil society is to be established here than it would mean the domination of the Bosniaks, because there would outnumber the rest. There is a huge paradox and and obvious logical discrepancy in this political statement. Because if Bosnia is to be a civil society, that automatically means that then we would not be talking about one's nationality first, and that instead we would have the citizens, as the main political measure. So what they are fearing the most is not a civil society, but loss of their political power maintained by now exclusively on medieval and racist prejudices.
Hi J.C., I completely understand your view of Obama and know that people think he will be beneficial. I see both Obama and McCain as being the same candidate - just saying what people want to hear.
As Euro said, a police state is coming and Obama is not there to prevent it - he is there to help it happen.
America is demanding socialism, which will only bring about more governmental control over the people. I only support Ron Paul for president, though he has no chance of winning.
I wish I felt as good about Obama as you, but I only see a man who is promising all the things he will never deliver. The police state is coming and cannot be stopped. This is because America demands it and they don't even know it. Socialism is one step closer to totalitarianism, and both McCain and Obama will bring it.
Hi, Bobz nice to hear from you. We have fundamentally different views on this one, but I respect your point of view. Leonard Cohen said in one of his songs: Everybody knows the good guys lost.
I just hope it will not be the case for those elections.
Steve said everything that I would have said.
I just wanted to add that I'm a black american and Obama sickens me. It's been a long time since I've seen some one so overtly propose such Marxist views on the stump. It's frightening to me. Furthermore, I am absolutely and entirely disgusted at the role that race and gender has played in this election. Give me some one who will defend my constitutional liberties and believes in a strong defense for this nation. Not conscripted service to the State. And I'll be happy.
Post a Comment